Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:34

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Can a 40-year-old date a 20-year-old?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What Gemini app features are free versus paid? [June 2025] - 9to5Google
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why did Microsoft acquire LinkedIn?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s Behind PayPal’s Will Ferrell Ads? - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Android 16's new beta makes changing call settings easier - Android Police
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Quia perspiciatis sed qui quidem voluptas excepturi possimus.